Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Suicidal and homicidal sharp force injury: a 5-year retrospective comparative study of hesitation marks and defense wounds.

In sharp force injury cases, the presence of hesitation marks or defense wounds figures among useful characteristics in the distinction of suicide and homicide. However, there are very few systematic comparative studies of hesitation marks and defense wounds in the forensic literature. This study was thus undertaken to systematically compare features of hesitation marks and defense wounds, with a particular emphasis on dispersion patterns. Over a 5-year period, all suicidal and homicidal sharp force cases were retrospectively reviewed for hesitation marks and defense wounds. A total of 58 suicides (7 women; 51 men) and 149 homicides (59 women; 60 men) were found, of which 74% (n = 43) were positive for hesitation marks and 61% (n = 91) for defense wounds. On the upper limbs, hesitations marks were more often observed on the anterior aspect of the limb, while defense wounds were equally distributed on the anterior and posterior aspect. For hand lesions, hesitation marks were generally located on one side only, while defense wounds more commonly involved both sides. No left or right predominance was observed in hesitations marks or defense wounds. Defense wounds were more widely distributed on the upper limbs than hesitation marks.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app