COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Wavefront aberrations in eyes with decentered ablations.

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive and functional outcomes and wavefront profiles in eyes with decentered ablations and eyes with well-centered ablations.

SETTING: Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised eyes with topographically diagnosed decentered ablations after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Refraction, contrast sensitivity, and ocular wavefront aberrations were measured preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. The induced aberrations in these eyes were compared with those in eyes with well-centered ablations.

RESULTS: Forty-six eyes (38 patients) had decentered ablations and 60 eyes (32 patients), well-centered ablations. The mean decentration in the study group was 0.86 mm +/- 0.29 (SD) (range 0.35 to 1.61 mm). There was no significant correlation between decentration and attempted refractive correction. There was, however, a statistically significant (P<.05) linear correlation between the distance of decentration and the magnitude of induced tilt (r = -0.31), coma (r = -0.41), and secondary astigmatism (r = 0.36). The induced changes in tilt, oblique astigmatism, vertical coma, and spherical aberration were statistically significantly higher in eyes with decentered ablations than in eyes with well-centered ablations. A statistically significantly higher percentage of eyes (87%) with well-centered ablations than eyes with decentered ablations (70%) had a postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better. There was no significant difference in contrast sensitivity between groups.

CONCLUSION: Eyes with decentered ablations had a significantly higher magnitude of induced aberrations and lower UCVA than eyes with well-centered ablations.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app