Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessment of appropriateness of indications for CT enterography in younger patients.

BACKGROUND: The small potential risk of radiation-induced cancer is increased in younger patients undergoing serial imaging with computed tomography enterography (CTE). We sought to determine the appropriateness of CTEs based on clinical indication in patients < or =35 years old, and the potential impact of evolution of practice to alternative magnetic resonance enterography (MRE).

METHODS: Over a 7-year period, the medical records of all patients < or =35 years old undergoing CTE were reviewed to determine the clinical indications for each CTE exam. An interdisciplinary consensus panel evaluated the appropriateness of all CTE exams based on American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria and peer-reviewed literature, classifying indications into "appropriate" or "inappropriate." For repeat CTEs, an "alternative MRE suggested" pathway was created. Criteria for evolution of practice to "alternative MRE" were suspicion of obstruction and evaluation of disease activity/therapeutic response in the absence of new symptoms.

RESULTS: In all, 2022 patients < or =35 years old underwent 2295 CTEs. Ninety-nine percent (2008/2022) of first-time CTE exams were "appropriate" by the defined criteria. A total of 197 patients (9.7%) underwent multiple exams, with 73% of these patients having Crohn's disease. Repeat exams occurred in 9% (18/197) with obstructive symptoms and evaluation of disease activity/therapeutic response in the absence of new symptoms in 41% (80/197).

CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary expert panel concluded that the vast majority of young patients underwent clinically appropriate first-time CTE exams. However, a shift in clinical practice to MRE appears warranted for approximately half of young patients undergoing repeat CTE examinations.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app