We have located links that may give you full text access.
Urine dipstick testing to rule out rhabdomyolysis in patients with suspected heat injury.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2009 September
BACKGROUND: Heat injury is a common, potentially life-threatening medical condition. In austere or mass-casualty conditions an easy to use, sensitive screening test could be a valuable tool to care providers and evacuation planners.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine if a simple urine dipstick test for blood is sensitive for detection of rhabdomyolysis in the suspected heat injury patient.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A convenience sample of patients presenting to a military community hospital Emergency Department during summer months with a presenting complaint consistent with suspected heat injury had urine dipstick testing performed for blood and compared with the results of formal urinalysis and serum creatine kinase.
RESULTS: 60 patients were enrolled in the study, seven had creatine kinase levels greater than 1000 U/L, 14 had levels greater than 500 U/L, and 26 had levels greater than 250 U/L. Using 1000 U/L, urine dipstick testing had a sensitivity of 14% and a specificity of 85%.
CONCLUSIONS: Urine dipstick testing for blood is not a useful screening test for rhabdomyolysis in patients suspected to have significant heat injury.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine if a simple urine dipstick test for blood is sensitive for detection of rhabdomyolysis in the suspected heat injury patient.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A convenience sample of patients presenting to a military community hospital Emergency Department during summer months with a presenting complaint consistent with suspected heat injury had urine dipstick testing performed for blood and compared with the results of formal urinalysis and serum creatine kinase.
RESULTS: 60 patients were enrolled in the study, seven had creatine kinase levels greater than 1000 U/L, 14 had levels greater than 500 U/L, and 26 had levels greater than 250 U/L. Using 1000 U/L, urine dipstick testing had a sensitivity of 14% and a specificity of 85%.
CONCLUSIONS: Urine dipstick testing for blood is not a useful screening test for rhabdomyolysis in patients suspected to have significant heat injury.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app