We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Pulmonary Mycobacterium xenopi infection in non-HIV-infected patients: a systematic review.
SETTING: The incidence of Mycobacterium xenopi infections is increasing worldwide. The characteristics and optimal management of patients with pulmonary M. xenopi infections have not been well established.
METHODS: Systematic review of English- and French-language studies reporting at least two cases of microbiologically confirmed M. xenopi lung infection. Studies were independently reviewed by two reviewers. We described the risk factors and clinical presentation of advanced infection, and examined the impact on clinical success and mortality of including individual antimycobacterial drugs in the treatment regimen.
RESULTS: A total of 48 studies reporting on 1255 subjects were included. The majority were retrospective case series. There was marked heterogeneity among the studies. Patients were generally middle-aged men with a history of obstructive lung disease or prior tuberculosis, presenting with an upper lobe cavitary infection. There was no clear association between administration of particular drugs and clinical success or mortality.
CONCLUSION: We could not demonstrate any advantage of specific drugs in the treatment of pulmonary M.xenopi infection. Observations from the pooled data are likely subject to significant confounding and selection biases. The inability to make firm conclusions on the optimal management of this increasingly common infection strongly underscores the need for further research.
METHODS: Systematic review of English- and French-language studies reporting at least two cases of microbiologically confirmed M. xenopi lung infection. Studies were independently reviewed by two reviewers. We described the risk factors and clinical presentation of advanced infection, and examined the impact on clinical success and mortality of including individual antimycobacterial drugs in the treatment regimen.
RESULTS: A total of 48 studies reporting on 1255 subjects were included. The majority were retrospective case series. There was marked heterogeneity among the studies. Patients were generally middle-aged men with a history of obstructive lung disease or prior tuberculosis, presenting with an upper lobe cavitary infection. There was no clear association between administration of particular drugs and clinical success or mortality.
CONCLUSION: We could not demonstrate any advantage of specific drugs in the treatment of pulmonary M.xenopi infection. Observations from the pooled data are likely subject to significant confounding and selection biases. The inability to make firm conclusions on the optimal management of this increasingly common infection strongly underscores the need for further research.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app