Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Detection of foreign bodies in the hand.

Fresh cadaver hands were used to compare the ability of routine x-ray, xeroradiography, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging to identify a variety of foreign bodies including glass, gravel, plastic, and wood in the soft tissue of the hand. All types of glass were easily seen by all imaging methods. Gravel foreign bodies were visible with all methods except magnetic resonance imaging where ferromagnetic streak artifacts obscured visualization. Plastic, although not seen by routine x-ray or xeroradiography, was faintly seen by computed tomography, and easily detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Wooden foreign bodies, especially when wet, were seen only by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Xeroradiography had no benefit over plain films in identifying foreign bodies and should be discarded in favor of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging when plain films are unrevealing. A practical guide for identifying foreign bodies in the soft tissues of the hand is presented.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app