We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Role of pretreatment 18FDG-PET/CT in surgical decision-making for head and neck cancers.
Head & Neck 2010 September
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use, the utility of pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) remains undefined. In this study, we aim to determine its accuracy in nodal disease.
METHODS: In all, 111 patients managed between 2003 and 2007 were analyzed.
RESULTS: For squamous cell cancers (SCCs) with any increased nodal uptake (mild to high), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were 75%, 95%, 85%, and 90%. However, if PET was deemed positive for only moderate to high uptake, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 71%, 95%, 85%, and 89%. In patients undergoing elective neck dissection, the accuracy was lower: for any increased uptake, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 66%, 96%, 83%, and 92%, whereas for moderate to high uptake, these were 52%, 97%, 79%, and 89%.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in PET/CT technology, these statistics suggest that PET/CT is not sufficiently accurate to direct superselective neck dissections, or to guide therapeutic decisions in the N0 neck.
METHODS: In all, 111 patients managed between 2003 and 2007 were analyzed.
RESULTS: For squamous cell cancers (SCCs) with any increased nodal uptake (mild to high), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were 75%, 95%, 85%, and 90%. However, if PET was deemed positive for only moderate to high uptake, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 71%, 95%, 85%, and 89%. In patients undergoing elective neck dissection, the accuracy was lower: for any increased uptake, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 66%, 96%, 83%, and 92%, whereas for moderate to high uptake, these were 52%, 97%, 79%, and 89%.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in PET/CT technology, these statistics suggest that PET/CT is not sufficiently accurate to direct superselective neck dissections, or to guide therapeutic decisions in the N0 neck.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app