Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Open adhesiolysis is more effective in reducing adhesion reformation than laparoscopic adhesiolysis in an experimental model.

BACKGROUND: This study compared adhesion reformation after open and laparoscopic adhesiolysis in a rat model.

METHODS: Adhesions were induced by surgically creating ischaemic buttons on the peritoneal side wall. After 7 days the animals underwent laparoscopy with carbon dioxide insufflation or laparotomy to score and lyse adhesions. Peritoneal tissue and fluid were collected after 24 h in a subset of animals, and adhesion reformation was scored 7 days after lysis in the remainder. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) 1, transforming growth factor (TGF) beta1 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha mRNA, and total fibrinolytic activity were assessed. The abdomen of non-operated animals was insufflated for 7, 15 or 30 min with carbon dioxide, after which tPA and PAI-1 mRNA and total fibrinolytic activity were measured.

RESULTS: Animals that underwent open adhesiolysis had 60 per cent fewer reformed adhesions than the laparoscopic adhesiolysis group (P < 0.001). There were no differences in tPA activity or tPA, PAI-1 and TNF-alpha mRNA between groups, but TGF-beta1 mRNA levels were significantly increased in the open group. Carbon dioxide insufflation did not affect peritoneal tPA activity.

CONCLUSION: Open adhesiolysis may be more beneficial in minimizing adhesion reformation in the management of adhesion-related complications.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app