We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Cone ERG responses in patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (SLOS).
Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology 2010 October
PURPOSE: To evaluate cone and cone-driven retinal function in patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS), a condition characterized by low cholesterol. Rod and rod-driven function in patients with SLOS are known to be abnormal.
METHODS: Electroretinographic (ERG) responses to full-field stimuli presented on a steady, rod suppressing background were recorded in 13 patients who had received long-term cholesterol supplementation. Cone photoresponse sensitivity (S(CONE)) and saturated amplitude (R(CONE)) parameters were estimated using a model of the activation of phototransduction, and post-receptor b-wave and 30 Hz flicker responses were analyzed. The responses of the patients were compared to those of control subjects (N = 13).
RESULTS: Although average values of both S(CONE) and R(CONE) were lower than in controls, the differences were not statistically significant. Post-receptor b-wave amplitude and implicit time and flicker responses were normal.
CONCLUSIONS: The normal cone function contrasts with the significant abnormalities in rod function that were found previously in these same patients. Possibly, cholesterol supplementation has a greater protective effect on cones than on rods as has been demonstrated in the rat model of SLOS.
METHODS: Electroretinographic (ERG) responses to full-field stimuli presented on a steady, rod suppressing background were recorded in 13 patients who had received long-term cholesterol supplementation. Cone photoresponse sensitivity (S(CONE)) and saturated amplitude (R(CONE)) parameters were estimated using a model of the activation of phototransduction, and post-receptor b-wave and 30 Hz flicker responses were analyzed. The responses of the patients were compared to those of control subjects (N = 13).
RESULTS: Although average values of both S(CONE) and R(CONE) were lower than in controls, the differences were not statistically significant. Post-receptor b-wave amplitude and implicit time and flicker responses were normal.
CONCLUSIONS: The normal cone function contrasts with the significant abnormalities in rod function that were found previously in these same patients. Possibly, cholesterol supplementation has a greater protective effect on cones than on rods as has been demonstrated in the rat model of SLOS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app