We have located links that may give you full text access.
Management of metastatic high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: FIGO stages II-IV: risk factor score > or = 7.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment of metastatic high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), including durable complete response rates to chemotherapy, factors affecting response to therapy, and overall survival.
STUDY DESIGN: Forty women with metastatic high-risk GTN (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stages II-IV, score > or = 7) completed treatment between 1986 (when EMA-CO became the standard chemotherapy for high-risk disease) and 2009, including 26 who were treated primarily and 14 who were treated secondarily. Patients who had incomplete responses or developed resistance to EMA-CO or other methotrexate-containing regimens were treated with drug combinations employing etoposide and a platinum agent with or without bleomycin or ifosfamide. Adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery were used in selected patients. Clinical response and survival as well as factors affecting outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 90% (36 of 40): 92% (24/26) for primary treatment and 86% (12/14) for secondary treatment. Twenty-one patients (53%) had durable complete clinical responses to initial treatment, 15 patients (37%) developed resistance to initial chemotherapy but were subsequently placed into lasting remission with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without surgery and 4 patients (10%) died of widespread metastatic disease. Durable complete clinical response to initial chemotherapy was significantly influenced by FIGO stage (II and III, 63%, vs. IV, 31%, p = 0.05) and risk factor score (< 12, 71%, vs. > or = 12, 32%, p < 0.02). Survival was also significantly associated with both FIGO stage (II and III, 100%, vs. IV, 69%, p < 0.01) and score (< 12, 100%, vs. > or = 12, 79%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The use of EMA-CO chemotherapy as primary treatment and platinum-based chemotherapy along with surgical excision of resistant disease as secondary treatment for patients with metastatic high-risk GTN resulted in a survival rate of 90%. All patients who died had FIGO stage IV and risk factors scores > or = 12.
STUDY DESIGN: Forty women with metastatic high-risk GTN (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stages II-IV, score > or = 7) completed treatment between 1986 (when EMA-CO became the standard chemotherapy for high-risk disease) and 2009, including 26 who were treated primarily and 14 who were treated secondarily. Patients who had incomplete responses or developed resistance to EMA-CO or other methotrexate-containing regimens were treated with drug combinations employing etoposide and a platinum agent with or without bleomycin or ifosfamide. Adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery were used in selected patients. Clinical response and survival as well as factors affecting outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 90% (36 of 40): 92% (24/26) for primary treatment and 86% (12/14) for secondary treatment. Twenty-one patients (53%) had durable complete clinical responses to initial treatment, 15 patients (37%) developed resistance to initial chemotherapy but were subsequently placed into lasting remission with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without surgery and 4 patients (10%) died of widespread metastatic disease. Durable complete clinical response to initial chemotherapy was significantly influenced by FIGO stage (II and III, 63%, vs. IV, 31%, p = 0.05) and risk factor score (< 12, 71%, vs. > or = 12, 32%, p < 0.02). Survival was also significantly associated with both FIGO stage (II and III, 100%, vs. IV, 69%, p < 0.01) and score (< 12, 100%, vs. > or = 12, 79%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The use of EMA-CO chemotherapy as primary treatment and platinum-based chemotherapy along with surgical excision of resistant disease as secondary treatment for patients with metastatic high-risk GTN resulted in a survival rate of 90%. All patients who died had FIGO stage IV and risk factors scores > or = 12.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app