Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Sputum induction in routine clinical care of children with cystic fibrosis.

Journal of Pediatrics 2010 December
OBJECTIVE: To determine the microbiological yield of induced sputum (IS) samples compared with conventional airway samples, spontaneously expectorated sputum and throat swabs, in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) attending an outpatient clinic.

STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-five children with CF (75 able to spontaneously expectorate sputum) were included in this prospective cross-sectional comparative study. After obtaining expectorated sputum or throat swabs samples, IS was obtained by performing the sputum induction procedure using an eFlow device (PARI, Starnberg, Germany). CF bacterial culture results were compared between the two procedures.

RESULTS: Differences in culture results between samples were observed in 25 of 94 (27%) patients. IS had a significantly higher yield for CF pathogens, with 80% of the differences being due to detection of additional organisms in IS samples. Overall, SI was well tolerated, but 12 of 95 cases had a >20% postinduction decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The whole SI procedure took 30 to 85 minutes of clinic time, and its estimated additional cost was $150 (US)/patient.

CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum has a higher microbiological yield compared with the conventional samples in children with CF, even in patients capable of expectorating sputum spontaneously. Although sputum induction is safe and tolerable, it is time-consuming and expensive in routine clinical settings.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app