We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills in a large U.S. cohort comparing progestogen and regimen.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011 January
OBJECTIVE: To estimate real-life effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills by progestogen, length of pill-free interval, and body mass index while focusing on the effect of progestogens with a long half-life and on 24-day oral contraceptive pills regimens.
METHODS: Outcome data from 52,218 U.S. participants in the International Active Surveillance of Women Taking Oral Contraceptives—a large, prospective, controlled, noninterventional, long-term cohort study with active surveillance of the study participants—were used to analyze contraceptive failure in association with oral contraceptive pills use. Low loss to follow-up is ensured by a comprehensive follow-up procedure. Contraceptive failure rates are described by Pearl Index and life-table analysis. Inferential statistics for contraceptive failure are based on Cox regression models.
RESULTS: Analyses are based on 1,634 unintended pregnancies during 73,269 woman-years of oral contraceptive pills exposure. Life-table estimates of contraceptive failure for a 24-day regimen of drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol and 21-day regimens of other progestogens were 2.1% and 3.5% after the first study year, and 4.7% and 6.7% after the third year. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.7 (95% confidence interval 0.6–0.8). Direct comparisons of the 24-day and 21-day regimens of drospirenone and norethisterone, respectively, showed also lower contraceptive failure rates for 24-day regimens. Contraceptive failure rates adjusted for age, parity and educational level showed a slight increase with higher body mass index.
CONCLUSION: The 24-day oral contraceptive regimens containing a progestogen with a long half-life show higher contraceptive effectiveness under routine medical conditions compared with conventional 21-day regimens. Obesity seems to be associated with a slight reduction of contraceptive effectiveness.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00335257.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
METHODS: Outcome data from 52,218 U.S. participants in the International Active Surveillance of Women Taking Oral Contraceptives—a large, prospective, controlled, noninterventional, long-term cohort study with active surveillance of the study participants—were used to analyze contraceptive failure in association with oral contraceptive pills use. Low loss to follow-up is ensured by a comprehensive follow-up procedure. Contraceptive failure rates are described by Pearl Index and life-table analysis. Inferential statistics for contraceptive failure are based on Cox regression models.
RESULTS: Analyses are based on 1,634 unintended pregnancies during 73,269 woman-years of oral contraceptive pills exposure. Life-table estimates of contraceptive failure for a 24-day regimen of drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol and 21-day regimens of other progestogens were 2.1% and 3.5% after the first study year, and 4.7% and 6.7% after the third year. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.7 (95% confidence interval 0.6–0.8). Direct comparisons of the 24-day and 21-day regimens of drospirenone and norethisterone, respectively, showed also lower contraceptive failure rates for 24-day regimens. Contraceptive failure rates adjusted for age, parity and educational level showed a slight increase with higher body mass index.
CONCLUSION: The 24-day oral contraceptive regimens containing a progestogen with a long half-life show higher contraceptive effectiveness under routine medical conditions compared with conventional 21-day regimens. Obesity seems to be associated with a slight reduction of contraceptive effectiveness.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00335257.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app