Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal lung masses.

AIM: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of prenatal diagnostic features, particularly congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio (CVR), in predicting outcomes for fetuses with lung masses.

METHODS: The records and imaging features of all fetuses referred to the Texas Children's Fetal Center with a fetal lung mass between July 2001 and May 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Data collected included gestational age (GA) at diagnosis, fetal magnetic resonance imaging findings, CVR, mass size, nature of fetal treatment, surgical findings, pathology, and outcome. Data were analyzed for predicting development of hydrops or the need for fetal therapy using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS: Of 82 fetuses (41 male) evaluated for a lung mass, 53 (65%) were left-sided (1 bilateral), and the mean (SD) GA at diagnosis was 21.5 (4.3) weeks. Seventy-three fetuses underwent fetal magnetic resonance imaging at a mean (SD) GA of 26.1 (4.6) weeks. Thirteen fetuses (16%) had fetal treatment. Four fetuses with hydrops underwent open fetal surgical resection, and 3 survived. Six fetuses with large lung masses and persistent mediastinal compression near term underwent ex-utero intrapartum therapy-to-resection procedures, and 3 fetuses with hydrops underwent serial thoracentesis. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio correlated strongly with the development of hydrops and the need for fetal therapy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (P < .0001) and 0.88 (P < .0001), respectively. Of 18 fetuses with a CVR greater than 2.0 compared with 2 (3%) of 60 with a CVR of 2.0 or less, 10 (56%) required fetal intervention (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION: Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio correlates strongly with the development of fetal hydrops and the need for fetal intervention. A threshold value of 2.0 yields the most powerful statistical results.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app