We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis.
Archives of Surgery 2011 June
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and adverse event rates of early vs interval appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis.
DESIGN: Nonblinded randomized trial.
SETTING: A tertiary-referral urban children's hospital.
PATIENTS: A total of 131 patients younger than 18 years with a preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.
INTERVENTIONS: Early appendectomy (within 24 hours of admission) vs interval appendectomy (6-8 weeks after diagnosis).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time away from normal activities (days). Secondary outcomes included the overall adverse event rates and the rate of predefined specific adverse events (eg, intra-abdominal abscess, surgical site infection, unplanned readmission).
RESULTS: Early appendectomy, compared with interval appendectomy, significantly reduced the time away from normal activities (mean, 13.8 vs 19.4 days; P < .001). The overall adverse event rate was 30% for early appendectomy vs 55% for interval appendectomy (relative risk with interval appendectomy, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.87; P = .003). Of the patients randomized to interval appendectomy, 23 (34%) had an appendectomy earlier than planned owing to failure to improve (n = 17), recurrent appendicitis (n = 5), or other reasons (n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Early appendectomy significantly reduced the time away from normal activities. The overall adverse event rate after early appendectomy was significantly lower compared with interval appendectomy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00435032.
DESIGN: Nonblinded randomized trial.
SETTING: A tertiary-referral urban children's hospital.
PATIENTS: A total of 131 patients younger than 18 years with a preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.
INTERVENTIONS: Early appendectomy (within 24 hours of admission) vs interval appendectomy (6-8 weeks after diagnosis).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time away from normal activities (days). Secondary outcomes included the overall adverse event rates and the rate of predefined specific adverse events (eg, intra-abdominal abscess, surgical site infection, unplanned readmission).
RESULTS: Early appendectomy, compared with interval appendectomy, significantly reduced the time away from normal activities (mean, 13.8 vs 19.4 days; P < .001). The overall adverse event rate was 30% for early appendectomy vs 55% for interval appendectomy (relative risk with interval appendectomy, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.87; P = .003). Of the patients randomized to interval appendectomy, 23 (34%) had an appendectomy earlier than planned owing to failure to improve (n = 17), recurrent appendicitis (n = 5), or other reasons (n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Early appendectomy significantly reduced the time away from normal activities. The overall adverse event rate after early appendectomy was significantly lower compared with interval appendectomy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00435032.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app