Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Concomitant NovaSure endometrial ablation and Essure tubal sterilization: a review of 100 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the success rate, complications, and technical difficulties of concomitant NovaSure radiofrequency global endometrial ablation (NS-GEA) and Essure hysteroscopic sterilization (EHS).

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of 100 women undergoing concomitant NS-GEA and EHS for abnormal uterine bleeding. The combined procedure was completed using conscious sedation, in an outpatient setting. Patients were asked to return three months post procedure to have proper micro-insert positioning confirmed by hysterosalpingogram, ultrasound, and/or pelvic radiograph.

RESULTS: An average of five micro-inserts were left trailing into the endometrial cavity. The mean duration of the procedure was on average 17.1 minutes. Eighty-seven patients returned for follow-up. The combined procedure was successful in 80 of these 87 patients (92%) and not successful in seven patients (8%). To improve visualization of the tubal ostia, 25 patients had suction curettage after NS-GEA, with no significant increase in the procedure time (P = 0.927). Technical difficulties included impaired visualization of the tubal ostia (7.4%), difficulty in visualizing or counting micro-inserts after placement (3.2%), and resistance to micro-insert placement (3.2%). The procedure complications were intrauterine synechiae (5.7%), endometritis (2.3%), pain that required an emergency room visit (2.3%), and migration of micro-inserts with or without perforation (4.6%).

CONCLUSION: Concomitant NS-GEA and EHS is a safe and efficient method of providing treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding and permanent female sterilization. The combined procedure can be safely moved from the operating theatre to an outpatient setting, completely independent of anaesthesia and day surgery services. Suction curettage should be considered before EHS. A small proportion of patients may develop post-procedure intrauterine synechiae that impaired the ability to document tubal occlusion by hysterosalpingogram.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app