We have located links that may give you full text access.
Endoscopic and oncologic outcomes after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: 1370 cases of absolute and extended indications.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011 September
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for endoscopic management such as EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early gastric cancer (EGC) are in evolution, with broader indication criteria.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical outcomes of endoscopic treatment, based on absolute indication and extended indication criteria and endoscopic methods.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care, academic medical center.
PATIENTS: EMR or ESD was performed on 1627 cases of EGC in 1447 patients from July 1994 to January 2009.
INTERVENTION: EMR and ESD.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical outcomes of EGC after EMR or ESD, based on the indication criteria.
RESULTS: Although the complete resection rate was higher (95.9% vs 88.4%; P < .001), and the complication rate was lower (6.8% vs 9.8%; P = .054) in the absolute than in the extended indication group, there was no between-group difference in the local recurrence rate (0.9% vs 1.1%; P = .783) at a median follow-up period of 32 months (interquartile range 22-48 months). In the extended indication group, ESD resulted in a significantly higher complete resection rate than EMR (83.0% vs 91.1%; P = .006).
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study.
CONCLUSION: ESD in the extended indication group showed acceptable clinical outcomes with a relatively high complete resection rate and a low local recurrence rate.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical outcomes of endoscopic treatment, based on absolute indication and extended indication criteria and endoscopic methods.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care, academic medical center.
PATIENTS: EMR or ESD was performed on 1627 cases of EGC in 1447 patients from July 1994 to January 2009.
INTERVENTION: EMR and ESD.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical outcomes of EGC after EMR or ESD, based on the indication criteria.
RESULTS: Although the complete resection rate was higher (95.9% vs 88.4%; P < .001), and the complication rate was lower (6.8% vs 9.8%; P = .054) in the absolute than in the extended indication group, there was no between-group difference in the local recurrence rate (0.9% vs 1.1%; P = .783) at a median follow-up period of 32 months (interquartile range 22-48 months). In the extended indication group, ESD resulted in a significantly higher complete resection rate than EMR (83.0% vs 91.1%; P = .006).
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study.
CONCLUSION: ESD in the extended indication group showed acceptable clinical outcomes with a relatively high complete resection rate and a low local recurrence rate.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app