We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
A comparison of multislice computerized tomography, cone-beam computerized tomography, and single photon emission computerized tomography for the assessment of bone invasion by oral malignancies.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) with multislice CT (MSCT) and single photon emission CT (SPECT) in the detection of bone invasion from oral malignancies.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective investigation, 77 patients with histologically proven malignancy of the oral cavity received MSCT, CBCT, and SPECT imaging of the head presurgically. Radiologic evaluations were compared with histopathologic examinations of the resected tumor specimens. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis as well as the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for MSCT were 0.8, 1.0, 1.0, and 0.75, respectively; for CBCT 0.92, 0.965, 0.98, and 0.875; and for SPECT 0.91, 0.4, 0.7, and 0.75. ROC analysis showed area under the curve values of 0.894 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.806-0.982) for MSCT; 0.931 (95% CI 0.835-1.000) for CBCT, and 0.716 (95% CI 0.566-0.866) for SPECT.
CONCLUSION: CBCT is accurate in predicting malignancies' bone involvement and can compete with MSCT and SPECT in detecting bone invasion in patients with oral malignancies.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective investigation, 77 patients with histologically proven malignancy of the oral cavity received MSCT, CBCT, and SPECT imaging of the head presurgically. Radiologic evaluations were compared with histopathologic examinations of the resected tumor specimens. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis as well as the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for MSCT were 0.8, 1.0, 1.0, and 0.75, respectively; for CBCT 0.92, 0.965, 0.98, and 0.875; and for SPECT 0.91, 0.4, 0.7, and 0.75. ROC analysis showed area under the curve values of 0.894 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.806-0.982) for MSCT; 0.931 (95% CI 0.835-1.000) for CBCT, and 0.716 (95% CI 0.566-0.866) for SPECT.
CONCLUSION: CBCT is accurate in predicting malignancies' bone involvement and can compete with MSCT and SPECT in detecting bone invasion in patients with oral malignancies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app