Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Detection of asymptomatic recurrence during routine oncological followup after radical cystectomy is associated with improved patient survival.

Journal of Urology 2011 November
PURPOSE: Whether routine surveillance to detect tumor recurrence after radical cystectomy improves patient survival remains in debate. We determined the impact on all cause mortality of symptoms at recurrence after cystectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 1,599 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma at our institution between 1980 and 2000. Median postoperative followup was 9.8 years (range 0 to 30.3). Overall survival in patients with recurrence stratified by the mode of diagnosis (asymptomatic vs symptomatic) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of the mode of diagnosing recurrence on survival.

RESULTS: A total of 606 patients (38%) experienced recurrence after surgery, of whom 137 (23%) were asymptomatic and 469 (77%) were symptomatic. Recurrence sites included abdomen/pelvis in 450 patients, bone in 185, thorax in 176, urothelium in 154 and brain in 39. The most common symptoms at recurrence were pain in 75.3% of patients, constitutional symptoms in 57.4% and hematuria in 12.4%. Five and 10-year overall survival in patients with symptomatic vs asymptomatic recurrence was 22% and 10% vs 46% and 26%, respectively (p <0.0001). On multivariate analysis patients who were symptomatic at recurrence were at almost 60% increased risk for death than those who were asymptomatic (HR 1.59, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Detecting asymptomatic recurrence after cystectomy was associated with significantly improved patient survival. Continued investigation to establish the optimal followup regimen remains necessary, balancing the benefit of early detection with the increased cost of routine surveillance.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app