We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Spread to the dorsal ulnar cutaneous branch: a pitfall during the routine antidromic sensory nerve conduction study of the ulnar nerve.
OBJECTIVE: To document the incidence and effects of a previously unreported pitfall during routine antidromic sensory nerve conduction study (SCS) of the ulnar nerve: the spread of the wrist stimulation to the dorsal ulnar cutaneous (DUC) branch.
METHODS: The subjects consisted of 20 healthy volunteers. An antidromic sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was recorded over the proximal interphalangeal joint of the little finger, and the DUC response was monitored over the dorsum of hand to check for the occurrence of this spread.
RESULTS: The spread occurred in all subjects, which caused a 4-87% increase in the SNAP amplitude. The likelihood that this spread may occur during routine SCS varied among the subjects, and also within an individual subject depending on minute shifts of the stimulating site. Selective stimulation of the ulnar main trunk up to maximal intensity without spread to the DUC was not achieved despite every effort in two subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: This spread phenomenon may occur frequently during routine antidromic SCS, but would not be recognized without monitoring the DUC response.
SIGNIFICANCE: This pitfall may interfere with the reproducibility of the SNAP amplitude, and also with the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the wrist.
METHODS: The subjects consisted of 20 healthy volunteers. An antidromic sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was recorded over the proximal interphalangeal joint of the little finger, and the DUC response was monitored over the dorsum of hand to check for the occurrence of this spread.
RESULTS: The spread occurred in all subjects, which caused a 4-87% increase in the SNAP amplitude. The likelihood that this spread may occur during routine SCS varied among the subjects, and also within an individual subject depending on minute shifts of the stimulating site. Selective stimulation of the ulnar main trunk up to maximal intensity without spread to the DUC was not achieved despite every effort in two subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: This spread phenomenon may occur frequently during routine antidromic SCS, but would not be recognized without monitoring the DUC response.
SIGNIFICANCE: This pitfall may interfere with the reproducibility of the SNAP amplitude, and also with the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the wrist.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app