JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The fallacy of the lacune hypothesis.

We review the definition, pathogenesis, natural history, and prognosis and describe the first experimental model of lacunes. Defined pathologically or radiologically, lacunes are small cerebral infarcts which become cystic and are caused by occlusion of small arteries. The clinical definition of lacune is confused. The word "lacune" means a small stroke. While the immediate mortality rate from a small stroke is low, many patients are unable to return to work and the long-term prognosis is guarded. Photochemical damage to the carotid artery of rats produces microemboli to the brain, resulting in cavitary lesions resembling lacunes in humans. The "lacune hypothesis" is a fallacy because small cerebral infarcts are not caused solely by a combination of hypertension and small vessel disease, and the various "lacunar syndromes" are simply small strokes which should be investigated as such.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app