We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Guided growth for ankle valgus.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 2011 December
BACKGROUND: Ankle valgus may be insidious and common in a variety of congenital conditions including clubfoot, neuromuscular disorders and others or acquired after fracture, osteotomies, or other manipulations of the lower extremity. This can cause hindfoot pronaton, resulting in lateral impingement and excessive shoe wear. Orthoses do not change the natural history. Medial hemiepiphysiodesis of the tibia is an accepted method of correcting this problem. Difficulties with transmalleolor screw removal prompted us to adopt the tension band method. Our purpose was to outline the technique of using guided growth with a medial tension band plate and discuss the efficacy of this technique.
METHODS: We undertook this retrospective review of 33 patients (57 ankles) who underwent guided growth to correct ankle valgus and were followed until attaining full correction or skeletal maturity. Most of the implants were removed when the ankle was neutral to 5 degrees of varus overcorrection. We obtained weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of the ankles preoperatively, just before plate removal, and at final follow-up, measuring the lateral distal tibial angle and noting the fibular station. We documented the rate of correction and related complications.
RESULTS: The average age at surgery was 10.4 years (range, 6.1 to 14.6 y) and an average follow-up was 27 months (range, 12 to 57.5 mo). The lateral distal tibial angle improved from an average of 78.7 to 90 degrees at implant removal and measured 88.2 degrees at final follow-up. The rate of correction was calculated to be 0.6 degrees per month. The fibular station remained the same in 36 of 57 ankles and improved in 15 ankles. There were 2 cases of skin breakdown complicated by infection. There were no instances of hardware failure, excessive varus, or premature physeal closure and no patient has required an osteotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Without appropriate radiographs, ankle valgus may be mistaken for hindfoot valgus and mismanaged accordingly. Guided growth of the distal medial tibia has become our treatment of choice for ankle valgus in the growing child or adolescent. Use of plate epiphysiodesis is safe, well tolerated, may readily be combined with other treatments, and provides a rate of correction comparable to the transmalleolar screw method.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective review, no control series.
METHODS: We undertook this retrospective review of 33 patients (57 ankles) who underwent guided growth to correct ankle valgus and were followed until attaining full correction or skeletal maturity. Most of the implants were removed when the ankle was neutral to 5 degrees of varus overcorrection. We obtained weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of the ankles preoperatively, just before plate removal, and at final follow-up, measuring the lateral distal tibial angle and noting the fibular station. We documented the rate of correction and related complications.
RESULTS: The average age at surgery was 10.4 years (range, 6.1 to 14.6 y) and an average follow-up was 27 months (range, 12 to 57.5 mo). The lateral distal tibial angle improved from an average of 78.7 to 90 degrees at implant removal and measured 88.2 degrees at final follow-up. The rate of correction was calculated to be 0.6 degrees per month. The fibular station remained the same in 36 of 57 ankles and improved in 15 ankles. There were 2 cases of skin breakdown complicated by infection. There were no instances of hardware failure, excessive varus, or premature physeal closure and no patient has required an osteotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Without appropriate radiographs, ankle valgus may be mistaken for hindfoot valgus and mismanaged accordingly. Guided growth of the distal medial tibia has become our treatment of choice for ankle valgus in the growing child or adolescent. Use of plate epiphysiodesis is safe, well tolerated, may readily be combined with other treatments, and provides a rate of correction comparable to the transmalleolar screw method.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective review, no control series.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app