Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of pegylated interferon α-2b plus psoralen PUVA versus standard interferon α-2a plus PUVA in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of pegylated interferon α-2b (PEG-IFN α-2b) in combination with photochemotherapy (PUVA) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in comparison with standard IFN α plus PUVA.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study over a period of 7 years.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: A total of 17 consecutive CTCL patients (stage IA-IV) were retrospectively analysed for toxicity and response rates associated with PEG-IFN α-2b (1.5 μg/kg weekly) plus PUVA (n = 9) or standard IFN α-2a (9 MIU 3×/week) plus PUVA (n = 8).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences of response rates (complete/partial remission), progression-free survival, discontinuation of therapy, safety and toxicity profiles according to World Health Organization - Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (WHO-CTCAE).

RESULTS: Myelosuppression and liver toxicity occured more frequently during PEG-IFN α-2b plus PUVA treatment than during standard IFN α-2a plus PUVA therapy [77.8 vs. 50% (odds ratio 1.477) and 77.8 vs. 50% (odds ratio 1.692), respectively]. By contrast, the occurence of constitutional side-effects (mainly fatigue) [100 vs.77.8% (odds ratio 0.889)] and more adverse events leading to study discontinuation was considerably higher in the standard IFN α-2a plus PUVA group. The overall response rate in the PEG-IFN α-2b plus PUVA group (89%) was significantly superior.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma PEG-IFN α-2b plus PUVA might become a promising treatment alternative as its higher rate of myelosuppression and liver toxicity is outweighed by its lower percentage of constitutional side-effects, and its significantly higher overall response. Due to the small number of participants at this retrospective study, a larger prospective study is essential to verify our results.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app