EVALUATION STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Surgical management of extremely low birth weight infants with neonatal bowel perforation: a single-center experience and a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal perforation (FIP) are major causes of morbidity in infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical procedures applied, and the survival and long-term outcome of ELBW infants with NEC and FIP in a single-center study.

METHODS: Inborn and outborn ELBW infants (<1000 g) with NEC and FIP were analyzed retrospectively from 2002 to 2007. Data collected include surgical procedures, survival as well as complications, length of partial parenteral nutrition and hospital stay. The short-term and long-term outcomes after 2-7 years were assessed and compared with a matched control group.

RESULTS: Out of 280 ELBW infants, 28 underwent surgery, 19 because of FIP and 9 for NEC. Fourteen infants in the FIP group were treated with primary laparotomy and 5 with peritoneal drainage (PD). In the NEC group, only 1 infant was treated with PD. PD was used for unstable patients and was always followed by secondary laparotomy after stabilization. Five of 28 (18%) surgically treated ELBW infants and 4 (14%) matched controls died. The following complications occurred in the surgical group: complete (n = 1) or minor wound dehiscence (n = 4), stoma prolapse (n = 5), parastomal hernia (n = 2), stoma fistula (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 2). Dependency on parenteral nutrition was significantly shorter in infants with FIP, while there were no differences in time to stoma closure and length of hospital stay between those with FIP and those with NEC. Eleven of 23 (47.8%) surviving patients with FIP or NEC showed developmental delay, compared with 9 of 24 (37.5%) in the controls.

CONCLUSIONS: The management of EBLW infants with NEC and FIP remains challenging. Our treatment approach was associated with low mortality. Developmental delay seems to be caused by extreme prematurity rather than NEC- or FIP-related bowel perforation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app