We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
A comparison of two night ankle-foot orthoses used in the treatment of inferior heel pain: a preliminary investigation.
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official Journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons 2012 June
BACKGROUND: Non-operative treatment for plantar fasciitis varies widely and includes the use of night ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs). This study compares the effectiveness of a posterior AFO, which dorsiflexes the foot, with an anterior AFO, which maintains the foot in a plantigrade position.
METHOD: Each participant was given a questionnaire to fill in to evaluate how satisfied the participants were with the orthosis with regards to comfort, ease of use and appearance, and whether the pain in the foot was reduced and at what stage was the pain decreased.
RESULTS: Two-thirds of all participants confirmed that morning pain and stiffness was less after wearing the AFO; both types were relatively easy to don and doff, but the posterior orthosis was more uncomfortable and disrupted sleep. On average, the anterior AFO reduced heel pain more significantly than the posterior orthosis.
CONCLUSION: Plantar fasciitis night AFOs are poorly tolerated orthoses but their use can be justified in that the pain levels are reduced. The anterior AFOs are more comfortable and more effective than posterior AFOs.
METHOD: Each participant was given a questionnaire to fill in to evaluate how satisfied the participants were with the orthosis with regards to comfort, ease of use and appearance, and whether the pain in the foot was reduced and at what stage was the pain decreased.
RESULTS: Two-thirds of all participants confirmed that morning pain and stiffness was less after wearing the AFO; both types were relatively easy to don and doff, but the posterior orthosis was more uncomfortable and disrupted sleep. On average, the anterior AFO reduced heel pain more significantly than the posterior orthosis.
CONCLUSION: Plantar fasciitis night AFOs are poorly tolerated orthoses but their use can be justified in that the pain levels are reduced. The anterior AFOs are more comfortable and more effective than posterior AFOs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app