Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Distinct disease-risk groups in pediatric supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas.

No reliable classification is in clinical use for the therapeutic stratification of children with ependymoma, such that disease risk might be identified and patients treated to ensure a combination of maximal cure rates and minimal adverse therapeutic effects. This study has examined associations between clinicopathologic and cytogenetic variables and outcome in a trial cohort of children with ependymoma, with the aim of defining a practical scheme for stratifying this heterogeneous tumor. Intracranial ependymomas (n = 146) from children treated on the RT1 trial at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital were evaluated for the status of multiple pathological features. Interphase FISH (iFISH) defined the status of loci on chromosomes 1q (EXO1), 6q (LATS1) and 9, including 9p21 (CDKN2A). Data relating to these clinicopathological and cytogenetic variables were compared with survival data in order to model disease risk groups. Extent of surgical resection was a significant determinant of outcome in both supratentorial and infratentorial compartments. Tumor cell density and mitotic count were associated with outcome among children with posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 119). Among pathologic features, only brain invasion was associated with outcome in children with supratentorial ependymomas (n = 27). For posterior fossa tumors, gain of 1q was independently associated with outcome and in combination with clinicopathological variables defined both a two-tier and three-tier system of disease risk. Among children developing posterior fossa ependymomas treated with maximal surgical resection and conformal radiotherapy, key clinicopathological variables and chromosome 1q status can be used to define tiers of disease risk. In contrast, risk factors for pediatric supratentorial tumors are limited to sub-total resection and brain invasion.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app