We have located links that may give you full text access.
Overexpression of hexokinase-2 in giant cell tumor of bone is associated with false positive in bone tumor on FDG-PET/CT.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2012 November
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the usefulness of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) in 2-deoxy-2-F(18)-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant bone tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with bone tumors were examined by FDG-PET prior to histopathological diagnosis. The SUV(max) was calculated and compared between benign and malignant lesions, and among different histopathological subgroups, to identify false-positive histological subtypes.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the SUV(max) of benign (3.7 ± 3.3; n = 17) and malignant (5.3 ± 3.3; n = 62) bone tumors. However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the poor accuracy of this distinction. The cut-off value was determined to be 2.6, while the value of sensitivity and specificity was calculated to be 74.2 and 64.7 %, respectively. Giant cell tumor of bone (9.0 ± 2.0; n = 5) displayed a higher SUV(max) than osteosarcoma (4.2 ± 2.3; n = 18). Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that markers of these cancers, hexokinase-2 (HK-2) and glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT-1), supported our findings.
CONCLUSION: The poor accuracy of SUV(max) in 18F-FDG-PET/CT in distinguishing malignant from benign bone tumors was confirmed; some benign bone tumors showed high FDG uptake. Giant cell tumor of bone was a major false-positive histopathological subtype of bone tumors, showing high FDG accumulation. HK-2 contributed significantly to FDG uptake, whereas GLUT-1 appeared to play no role in FDG uptake in giant cell tumor of bone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with bone tumors were examined by FDG-PET prior to histopathological diagnosis. The SUV(max) was calculated and compared between benign and malignant lesions, and among different histopathological subgroups, to identify false-positive histological subtypes.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the SUV(max) of benign (3.7 ± 3.3; n = 17) and malignant (5.3 ± 3.3; n = 62) bone tumors. However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the poor accuracy of this distinction. The cut-off value was determined to be 2.6, while the value of sensitivity and specificity was calculated to be 74.2 and 64.7 %, respectively. Giant cell tumor of bone (9.0 ± 2.0; n = 5) displayed a higher SUV(max) than osteosarcoma (4.2 ± 2.3; n = 18). Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that markers of these cancers, hexokinase-2 (HK-2) and glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT-1), supported our findings.
CONCLUSION: The poor accuracy of SUV(max) in 18F-FDG-PET/CT in distinguishing malignant from benign bone tumors was confirmed; some benign bone tumors showed high FDG uptake. Giant cell tumor of bone was a major false-positive histopathological subtype of bone tumors, showing high FDG accumulation. HK-2 contributed significantly to FDG uptake, whereas GLUT-1 appeared to play no role in FDG uptake in giant cell tumor of bone.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app