We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
A 2-year prospective surveillance of pediatric traumatic optic neuropathy in the United Kingdom.
Journal of AAPOS : the Official Publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 2012 October
BACKGROUND: To report epidemiologic data on traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) in patients less than 18 years of age in the United Kingdom acquired by prospective population-based active surveillance through the British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit.
METHODS: Data were obtained from incident and 6-month follow-up questionnaires sent to reporting ophthalmologists over a period of 2 years. Main outcome measures were demographic data, clinical and visual function at presentation and follow-up, investigations, and treatments used.
RESULTS: A total of 26 cases (21 males) were identified; follow-up data were available for 23 (88%). Minimum estimated annual incidence was 0.99 cases per million. Leading causes of TON included 6 sports injuries (23%), 5 falls (19%), and 4 traffic accidents (16%). Presenting best-corrected visual acuity was ≤ 6/60 in 15 cases (58%), with no light perception in 7 cases (27%). Associated injuries were as follows: nonpenetrating injuries, 8 (31%); adnexal injuries, 3 (11.5%); orbital fractures, 5 (19%); skull fractures, 3 (12%); intracranial bleeding, 1 (4%). Fourteen (54%) received no treatment, and 9 (35%) were treated with steroids. Final visual acuity improved in 7 of 21 patients (33%), with 13 of 23 (56%) achieving final visual acuity ≤ 6/60, 10 of whom (43%) had no light perception. Baseline visual acuity was associated with last follow-up visual acuity (P = 0.03), but treatment and improvement of visual acuity by at least 3 lines were not associated. Treatment was more common in children with poor presenting vision (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence, natural history, poor presenting visual acuity, and male prevalence of TON in children appear similar to adults in adults in the UK.
METHODS: Data were obtained from incident and 6-month follow-up questionnaires sent to reporting ophthalmologists over a period of 2 years. Main outcome measures were demographic data, clinical and visual function at presentation and follow-up, investigations, and treatments used.
RESULTS: A total of 26 cases (21 males) were identified; follow-up data were available for 23 (88%). Minimum estimated annual incidence was 0.99 cases per million. Leading causes of TON included 6 sports injuries (23%), 5 falls (19%), and 4 traffic accidents (16%). Presenting best-corrected visual acuity was ≤ 6/60 in 15 cases (58%), with no light perception in 7 cases (27%). Associated injuries were as follows: nonpenetrating injuries, 8 (31%); adnexal injuries, 3 (11.5%); orbital fractures, 5 (19%); skull fractures, 3 (12%); intracranial bleeding, 1 (4%). Fourteen (54%) received no treatment, and 9 (35%) were treated with steroids. Final visual acuity improved in 7 of 21 patients (33%), with 13 of 23 (56%) achieving final visual acuity ≤ 6/60, 10 of whom (43%) had no light perception. Baseline visual acuity was associated with last follow-up visual acuity (P = 0.03), but treatment and improvement of visual acuity by at least 3 lines were not associated. Treatment was more common in children with poor presenting vision (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence, natural history, poor presenting visual acuity, and male prevalence of TON in children appear similar to adults in adults in the UK.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app