We have located links that may give you full text access.
CASE REPORTS
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Ultrasound as a useful tool in the diagnosis and management of traumatic nerve lesions.
OBJECTIVE: The possibility of depicting through ultrasound (US) the nerve and its surroundings should be very useful in traumatic nerve lesion (TNL) management. Our study aimed at evaluating the contribution of US as complementary tool in a neurophysiological laboratory for the diagnosis and management of TNL.
METHODS: A total of 112 nerves from 98 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of TNL were considered. Two independent and blinded clinicians, different from the examiners performing electrodiagnosis and US, classified clinical, neurophysiological and US findings and classified the contribution of US as follows: 'contributive' and 'non-contributive' if US confirmed the clinical and neurophysiological diagnosis or if US findings were unremarkable.
RESULTS: US was 'contributive' (strongly modified the diagnostic and therapeutic path) in 58% of cases (n: 65) providing information on therapeutic approach (immediate or delayed surgery), diagnosis and follow-up. US specifically contributed to the (1) assessment of nerve continuity/discontinuity, hence neurotmesis/axonotmesis; (2) identification of aetiology; and (3) demonstration of multiple sites of damage. US was contributive mainly in cases with neurophysiological evidence of complete axonal damage.
CONCLUSIONS: US should be used, when available, in all patients in whom TNL is suspected as it provides a more comprehensive diagnosis than neurophysiologic studies alone. Anatomical information is often crucial for choosing the most appropriate therapeutic strategies (and for surgical planning).
SIGNIFICANCE: US can improve the outcome of TNL.
METHODS: A total of 112 nerves from 98 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of TNL were considered. Two independent and blinded clinicians, different from the examiners performing electrodiagnosis and US, classified clinical, neurophysiological and US findings and classified the contribution of US as follows: 'contributive' and 'non-contributive' if US confirmed the clinical and neurophysiological diagnosis or if US findings were unremarkable.
RESULTS: US was 'contributive' (strongly modified the diagnostic and therapeutic path) in 58% of cases (n: 65) providing information on therapeutic approach (immediate or delayed surgery), diagnosis and follow-up. US specifically contributed to the (1) assessment of nerve continuity/discontinuity, hence neurotmesis/axonotmesis; (2) identification of aetiology; and (3) demonstration of multiple sites of damage. US was contributive mainly in cases with neurophysiological evidence of complete axonal damage.
CONCLUSIONS: US should be used, when available, in all patients in whom TNL is suspected as it provides a more comprehensive diagnosis than neurophysiologic studies alone. Anatomical information is often crucial for choosing the most appropriate therapeutic strategies (and for surgical planning).
SIGNIFICANCE: US can improve the outcome of TNL.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app