COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Medial retinaculum plasty versus medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability in adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Arthroscopy 2013 May
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of medial retinaculum plasty (MRP) and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with concomitant lateral retinacular release with respect to imaging and functional results.

METHODS: Seventy patients with recurrent patellar instability were randomly divided into 2 groups based on their birth years (even/odd), receiving either MRP or MPFLR. Lateral retinacular release was also performed in all patients. Preoperatively, all patients received magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the injury to the medial patellofemoral ligament. Computed tomography was performed before surgery and at follow-up. The subjective symptoms and functional outcome were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the Kujala score, the Tegner activity score, and a subjective questionnaire. The physical apprehension test was examined, and redislocation was recorded.

RESULTS: Patients were followed up for a mean period of 40 months (range, 24 to 55 months). The measurement results for the congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, and patellar lateral shift decreased significantly from the pretreatment measurements to the normal range at the latest follow-up, without a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). The median Kujala score had significantly improved after surgery. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups at the latest follow-up (P > .05). In 6 cases in the MRP group (19%) and 3 in the MPFLR group (9%), we found patellar lateral shift that exceeded 1.5 cm but was less than 2.0 cm with a firm endpoint for the apprehension test, without a significant difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomized study showed that MPFLR for recurrent patellar instability could achieve good clinical results, with a good congruous patellofemoral joint and good knee function. MRP could yield similar results to MPFLR for recurrent patellar instability in adults with medial patellofemoral ligament injuries from the patella or midsubstance portions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app