COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison of two ablation techniques.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation has increasingly been used to cure atrial fibrillation, but concerns have recently been raised that subclinical brain damage may occur because of microembolization during these procedures. We compared the occurrence of bubble formation seen on intracardiac echocardiography and the microembolic signals (MESs) detected by transcranial Doppler on the use of different ablation techniques and anticoagulation strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study included 35 procedures in 34 consecutive patients (age, 52; SD, 12.8 years; female:male 9:25). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed with a cryoballoon and the conventional anticoagulation protocol (activated clotting time >250 s) in 10 procedures (group 1), with a multipolar duty-cycled radiofrequency pulmonary group 2), and with regime a pulmonary vein ablation catheter with an aggressive anticoagulation (activated clotting time >320 s) in 13 procedures (group 3). The mean total numbers of MESs detected during the procedures were 833.7 (SD, 727.4) in group 1, 3142.6 (SD, 1736.4) in group 2, and 2204.6 (SD, 1078.1) in group 3 (P=0.0005). MESs were detected mostly during energy delivery in the pulmonary vein ablation catheter groups, whereas a relatively even distribution of emboli formation was seen during cryoballoon ablations. A significant correlation was found in all groups between the degree of bubble formation on intracardiac echocardiography and the number of MESs (P=0.0000).

CONCLUSIONS: Duty-cycled radiofrequency ablation is associated with significantly more MESs, even when more aggressive anticoagulation is applied. With both techniques most of these microemboli are gaseous in nature.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app