Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Listeria monocytogenes sequence type 6 and increased rate of unfavorable outcome in meningitis: epidemiologic cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed clinical characteristics, treatment, genetic diversity, and outcome of 92 adults with Listeria monocytogenes meningitis included in 2 prospective nationwide cohort studies.

METHODS: Episodes of community-acquired listerial meningitis confirmed by cerebrospinal fluid culture were included from 1998 to 2002 and 2006 to 2012. We compared patients and pathogen characteristics between cohorts and identified predictors for an unfavorable outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

RESULTS: Thirty episodes were included from 1998 to 2002 and 62 from 2006 to 2012; clinical and laboratory characteristics on admission were similar between cohorts. However, the rate of unfavorable outcome increased from 27% in the 1998-2002 cohort to 61% in the 2006-2012 cohort (P = .002). Differences between cohorts were increased use of adjunctive dexamethasone therapy (0% in 1998-2002 vs 53% in 2006-2012; P < .001) and emergence of infection by L. monocytogenes genotype sequence type 6 (ST6; 4% in 1998-2002 vs 29% in 2006-2012; P = .009). Multivariate regression analysis identified infection with L. monocytogenes ST6 as the sole predictor of unfavorable outcome (odds ratio, 3.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-13.33). Patients infected with genotypes other than ST6 also had an increased rate of unfavorable outcome over time (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS: The rate of unfavorable outcome among adults with listerial meningitis has increased over a 14-year period, from 27% to 61%. The emerging L. monocytogenes genotype ST6 was identified as the main factor leading to poorer prognosis. Adjunctive dexamethasone may be discontinued if L. monocytogenes is identified, as there is no proven benefit in Listeria meningitis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app