Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Morbidity in survivors of child and adolescent meningioma.

Cancer 2013 December 16
BACKGROUND: The extent of initial surgical resection has been identified as the strongest prognostic indicator for survival in child and adolescent meningioma. Given the paucity of data concerning long-term outcome, the authors undertook a meta-analysis to analyze morbidity in survivors of this disease.

METHODS: Individual patient data were obtained from 19 case series published over the last 23 years through direct communication with the authors. Ordinal logistic regression models were used to assess the influence of risk factors on morbidity.

RESULTS: Of 261 patients, 48% reported a completely normal life with no morbidity, and 25% had moderate/severe meningioma-associated morbidity at last follow-up. Multivariate analysis identified relapse as the only independent variable associated with an increased risk of morbidity (odds ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 2.11-7.65; P ≤ .001). Univariate analysis also revealed an increased risk for patients with neurofibromatosis (odds ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.48; P = .04). Subgroup analysis identified a higher incidence of morbidity among patients who had intracranial tumors with a skull base location compared with a nonskull base location (P ≤ .001). Timing at which morbidity occurred was available for 70 patients, with persistence of preoperative tumor-related symptoms in 67% and as a result of therapy in 20%.

CONCLUSIONS: The majority of survivors of child and adolescent meningioma had no or only mild long-term morbidity, whereas 25% had moderate/severe morbidity, with a significantly increased risk in patients with relapsed disease. In the majority, morbidity occurred as a consequence of the tumor itself, justifying aggressive surgery to achieve gross total resection. However, for patients with neurofibromatosis and skull base meningioma, a more cautious surgical approach should be reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app