Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The efficacy of mitomycin and stenting in choanal atresia repair: a 20 year experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of topical mitomycin and stenting in patients that have undergone endoscopic repair of choanal atresia.

METHODS: Retrospective review of 37 endoscopic operations on pediatric patients for choanal atresia.

RESULTS: Twenty-six sides were operated on in 17 patients; 37 total operations were performed. All 17 patients were repaired endoscopically with 1 patient requiring transpalatal revision surgery. Eight patients (47%) had a unilateral atresia and 9 (53%) were bilateral. Eleven total sides (42%) were treated initially with mitomycin. Eighteen percent of those sides required post-operative dilation vs. 40% of the sides not treated with mitomycin (p=0.39) and no patient in the mitomycin group required revision surgery compared to 20% of patients not treated with mitomycin (p=0.24). Significantly fewer sides in the mitomycin group (9%) developed granulation vs. those treated without (53%) (p=0.03). The average number of procedures performed (1.18 vs. 2.53; p=0.002) was significantly fewer in those patients treated with mitomycin vs. not. A greater amount of sides in the stent group developed granulation tissue (50% vs.0%; p=0.023). The average number of procedures performed was significantly greater in those patients treated with a stent (2.33 vs. 1.12; p=0.008). The average time spent in the hospital was significantly shorter (7.09 vs. 2.33 days; p=0.02) in those patients treated without stenting.

CONCLUSION: Topical mitomycin is efficacious as an adjuvant therapy as it was associated with the formation of less granulation tissue, a lower rate of restenosis and fewer surgeries. Stenting was associated with significantly more procedures, greater formation of granulation tissue and longer overall hospital stays. However, consideration should be given toward stent placement in all neonates for the prevention of post-operative airway obstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app