We have located links that may give you full text access.
Case Reports
Journal Article
Nonwavefront-guided Presby reversal treatment targeting a monofocal cornea after bi-aspheric ablation profile in a patient intolerant to multifocality.
Journal of Refractive Surgery 2014 March
PURPOSE: To analyze distance and near vision after a nonwavefront-guided Presby reversal treatment targeting a monofocal cornea in a patient intolerant to multifocality in the dominant eye.
METHODS: Case report.
RESULTS: An originally myopic patient treated for correcting distance ametropia and simultaneously alleviating presbyopic symptoms resulted in intolerance to the induced multifocality. Twenty-one months after the bi-aspheric multifocal treatment, the patient was treated with PresbyMAX reversal (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) to remove the previously induced multifocality. Original corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was -0.1 logMAR (20/16 Snellen) with +0.8 logMAR (J12) uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and changed to CDVA +0.1 logMAR (20/25 Snellen) with +0.2 logMAR (J4) UNVA before the Presby reversal procedure (all monocularly). Three months after the reversal treatment, uncorrected distance visual acuity and CDVA were both -0.1 logMAR (20/16 Snellen), and the patient was emmetropic and had no further visual complaint for distance, but at the cost of losing the UNVA.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonwavefront-guided Presby reversal treatments targeting a monofocal cornea after bi-aspheric ablation profile were successful.
METHODS: Case report.
RESULTS: An originally myopic patient treated for correcting distance ametropia and simultaneously alleviating presbyopic symptoms resulted in intolerance to the induced multifocality. Twenty-one months after the bi-aspheric multifocal treatment, the patient was treated with PresbyMAX reversal (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) to remove the previously induced multifocality. Original corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was -0.1 logMAR (20/16 Snellen) with +0.8 logMAR (J12) uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and changed to CDVA +0.1 logMAR (20/25 Snellen) with +0.2 logMAR (J4) UNVA before the Presby reversal procedure (all monocularly). Three months after the reversal treatment, uncorrected distance visual acuity and CDVA were both -0.1 logMAR (20/16 Snellen), and the patient was emmetropic and had no further visual complaint for distance, but at the cost of losing the UNVA.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonwavefront-guided Presby reversal treatments targeting a monofocal cornea after bi-aspheric ablation profile were successful.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app