We have located links that may give you full text access.
Outcomes of biopsies and excisions of dysplastic acral nevi: a study of 187 lesions.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 2014 April
BACKGROUND: Despite their frequency in clinical practice, controversy exists regarding the significance and management of dysplastic nevi (DN). Although the perception of DN as precursors to melanoma is questionable, excisions of biopsy-proven DN are commonplace in clinical practice. The management of dysplastic acral nevi is of interest given the challenge of surgery at acral sites.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of biopsies of clinically atypical acral nevi and excisions of histologically dysplastic acral nevi (HDN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive patients at a private dermatology practice who had a biopsy of an atypical acral nevus from December 2004 to July 2012.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven atypical acral nevi were biopsied from 168 patients (77 (41%) HDN, 108 (58%) common nevi). Based on initial histology, 30 (39%) HDN were recommended for excision and eight (10%) for clinical observation. Twenty-seven of the 77 HDN were excised; 23 (85%) revealed scar only, and four (15%) revealed residual DN not involving the margin.
CONCLUSION: Routine excision of biopsy-proven dysplastic acral nevi may not be necessary.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of biopsies of clinically atypical acral nevi and excisions of histologically dysplastic acral nevi (HDN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive patients at a private dermatology practice who had a biopsy of an atypical acral nevus from December 2004 to July 2012.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven atypical acral nevi were biopsied from 168 patients (77 (41%) HDN, 108 (58%) common nevi). Based on initial histology, 30 (39%) HDN were recommended for excision and eight (10%) for clinical observation. Twenty-seven of the 77 HDN were excised; 23 (85%) revealed scar only, and four (15%) revealed residual DN not involving the margin.
CONCLUSION: Routine excision of biopsy-proven dysplastic acral nevi may not be necessary.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app