COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interchangeability and reliability of femoral and tibial torsion measurements in children using 3D models based on biplanar radiography compared with CT measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Femoral and tibial torsion were measured in 50 patients (mean age, 10.9 years; range, 4.7-14.8 years) using 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography by two independent readers. Measurements on transverse CT images by two independent readers served as the reference standard. Intermethod and interreader agreement was calculated using descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS: Femoral and tibial torsion were -6°-65° and 6°-51° for 3D models based on biplanar radiography and -13°-59° and 4°-52° for CT measurements. The average difference (±SD) between the two methods was 4.9°±3.8° and 5.5°±4.1°, respectively. The intermethod ICC for biplanar radiography was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92) for femoral torsion and 0.75 (0.68-0.80) for tibial torsion. The interreader ICC was 0.93-0.97. Mean measurement differences between the two biplanar radiography readers were 3.4° (0.0°-11.0°) for femoral torsion and 3.9° (0.0°-15.0°) for tibial torsion. Mean interreader differences at CT were 3.3° (0.0°-9.0°) for femoral and 3.0° (0.0°-10.0°) for tibial torsion. There was no trend for larger intermethod differences with decreasing age of the children.

CONCLUSION: Femoral and tibial torsion measurements in children using 3D models based on biplanar radiography are comparable to CT measurement results. Despite skeletal immaturity, torsion measurements in children on biplanar radiography seem to be as reliable as those on CT images.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app