Laparoscopic treatment of pediatric hydrocele and the evaluation of the internal inguinal ring.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports of the laparoscopic findings of the internal inguinal ring (IIR) in patients with hydrocele. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) for hydrocele in comparison with that of open repair (OR) and compare the findings of the IIR between cases of hydrocele and inguinal hernia (IH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 69 consecutive patients with hydrocele who underwent surgery at our institution between April 2009 and February 2014. The patients were divided into two groups (LPEC and OR) according to the procedure. Age, length of operation/anesthesia, and complications were compared. Concerning the findings of the IIR, we classified the features into three categories, as follows: Type 1, flat; Type 2, narrow patent processus vaginalis (PPV) with a peritoneal veil; and Type 3, widely opened PPV. We then compared these findings between the cases of hydrocele and IH treated with LPEC during the study period.

RESULTS: Among a total of 69 patients, 40 underwent LPEC, and 29 underwent OR. There were no significant differences in the length of operation/anesthesia and complications. No recurrences were observed in either group. The findings of the IIR were mostly classified as Type 2 (59.1%) among the cases of hydrocele and Type 3 (92%) among the cases of IH.

CONCLUSIONS: LPEC is a safe and effective procedure for treating hydrocele. The findings of the IIR differ between cases of hydrocele and IH.