We have located links that may give you full text access.
Computed tomography-guided C2 pedicle screw placement for treatment of unstable hangman fractures.
Spine 2014 August 16
STUDY DESIGN: Case series and description of technique.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of inserting pedicle screws in unstable Hangman fracture cases by using intraoperative CT (O-arm) based navigation.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Hangman fracture, also known as traumatic spondylolisthesis of the C2, is defined as a fracture involving the lamina, articular facets, pedicles, or pars of the axis vertebra. Opinions vary regarding the optimal treatment of unstable Hangman fractures. Some authors have recommended the use of rigid orthosis, whereas others have recommended surgical stabilization. The peculiar anatomy of the upper cervical spine is highly variable, and the presence of surrounding neurovascular structures makes pedicle screw fixation even more technically challenging. The advent of intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation systems permits safe and accurate instrumentation of the cervical spine.
METHODS: Ten patients with unstable Hangman fracture, with age ranging from 17 years to 81 years, were operated under O-arm-based navigation, and screw position was confirmed with intraoperative computed tomographic scan.
RESULTS: A total of 52 screws were inserted under O-arm guidance: 20 in C2 pedicle, 20 in C3 lateral mass, and rest in C4 lateral mass. Screw misplacement was seen in only 1 C2 pedicle screw (1 of 20, 5%). No new-onset neurological deficit developed in any of the patients. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 21 months. Bony fusion was achieved in all. Full rotation was preserved at C1-C2 joint. All the patients (50%) with neurological deficits before surgery improved after surgery.
CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates that C2 pedicle screws can be put with precision under O-arm-guided navigation, and intraoperative computed tomographic scan can confirm position of screws. Patients can be operated and mobilized early with negligible risk of screw misplacement, with preservation of motion at the C1-C2 joint.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of inserting pedicle screws in unstable Hangman fracture cases by using intraoperative CT (O-arm) based navigation.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Hangman fracture, also known as traumatic spondylolisthesis of the C2, is defined as a fracture involving the lamina, articular facets, pedicles, or pars of the axis vertebra. Opinions vary regarding the optimal treatment of unstable Hangman fractures. Some authors have recommended the use of rigid orthosis, whereas others have recommended surgical stabilization. The peculiar anatomy of the upper cervical spine is highly variable, and the presence of surrounding neurovascular structures makes pedicle screw fixation even more technically challenging. The advent of intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation systems permits safe and accurate instrumentation of the cervical spine.
METHODS: Ten patients with unstable Hangman fracture, with age ranging from 17 years to 81 years, were operated under O-arm-based navigation, and screw position was confirmed with intraoperative computed tomographic scan.
RESULTS: A total of 52 screws were inserted under O-arm guidance: 20 in C2 pedicle, 20 in C3 lateral mass, and rest in C4 lateral mass. Screw misplacement was seen in only 1 C2 pedicle screw (1 of 20, 5%). No new-onset neurological deficit developed in any of the patients. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 21 months. Bony fusion was achieved in all. Full rotation was preserved at C1-C2 joint. All the patients (50%) with neurological deficits before surgery improved after surgery.
CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates that C2 pedicle screws can be put with precision under O-arm-guided navigation, and intraoperative computed tomographic scan can confirm position of screws. Patients can be operated and mobilized early with negligible risk of screw misplacement, with preservation of motion at the C1-C2 joint.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app