JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Current Practice and Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair: A Multi-institutional Analysis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In order to better understand the current practice and outcomes of thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia (EA)/tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), a multi-institutional analysis was conducted among seven Japanese institutes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to the seven institutes regarding the surgical technique, postoperative management, and outcomes of thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF.

RESULTS: The operation was uniformly performed via an intrapleural approach in the 0-45° prone position. The TEF was occluded with suture ligature in four (57.1%) institutes and clips in the remaining three (42.9%) institutes. Anastomosis was performed using the extracorporeal knot-tying technique in four institutes and the intracorporeal technique in three institutes. Patients were routinely left intubated and paralyzed for 3-7 days postoperatively in four institutes. In total, 58 patients underwent thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF. Fifty-two (89.7%) of the patients underwent successful thoracoscopic repair. Six (10.3%) operations were converted to open thoracotomy because of a long gap (n=4), right aortic arch (n=1), and intraoperative instability (n=1). The body weight at operation ranged from 1.2 to 4.6 kg, and the operative time ranged from 115 to 428 minutes. There were no major intraoperative complications. Eleven patients (19.0%) suffered from anastomotic leakage. Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) developed anastomotic stricture. One patient died during the postoperative period because of an unrelated disease. Recurrent TEF developed in three patients (5.2%). Thirteen patients (22.4%) later required fundoplication.

CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF was comparable to that of the open procedure. As considerable variability was observed among the seven institutes with respect to the surgical technique and management, standardizing the surgical management may improve the outcome.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app