We have located links that may give you full text access.
Surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients: a retrospective study.
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 2015 May
OBJECTIVE: To analyze perioperetive clinical features and outcomes of surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) in elderly patients.
METHODS: From 2006 to 2013, we retrospectively reviewed 136 patients with CSM who underwent surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: 70 years or older (elderly group, 58 patients) and younger than 70 years (younger group, 78 patients). The course of disease, surgical outcome, morbidities, and postoperative complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: In the elderly group, follow-up lasted 9-76 months (mean 39.6 months), the course of disease was 23.7 months (range 4-72 months). Anterior cervical decompression and fusions and posterior laminectomy and fixation were performed in 24 and 34 patients, respectively. The operative time averaged 103 min (range 48-210 min). In the younger group, follow-up lasted 10-71 months (mean 37.8 months), the course of disease was 12.6 months (range 2-58 months). Anterior cervical decompression and fusions and posterior laminectomy and fixation were performed in 75 and three patients, respectively. The prevalence of chronic diseases and postoperative complications were higher in the elderly group than the younger group. The recovery rates of JOA score were 40.82 ± 11.20% in the elderly group and 64.10 ± 22.61% in the younger group. The therapeutic effects of surgery were significantly better for the young patients than for the elderly.
CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with CSM present long period and serious symptoms, and the degeneration of multiple organs. Surgical decompression for CSM appears to be a beneficial and safe procedure for older patients if properly handled, although the recovery rate is poorer than that of younger patients.
METHODS: From 2006 to 2013, we retrospectively reviewed 136 patients with CSM who underwent surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: 70 years or older (elderly group, 58 patients) and younger than 70 years (younger group, 78 patients). The course of disease, surgical outcome, morbidities, and postoperative complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: In the elderly group, follow-up lasted 9-76 months (mean 39.6 months), the course of disease was 23.7 months (range 4-72 months). Anterior cervical decompression and fusions and posterior laminectomy and fixation were performed in 24 and 34 patients, respectively. The operative time averaged 103 min (range 48-210 min). In the younger group, follow-up lasted 10-71 months (mean 37.8 months), the course of disease was 12.6 months (range 2-58 months). Anterior cervical decompression and fusions and posterior laminectomy and fixation were performed in 75 and three patients, respectively. The prevalence of chronic diseases and postoperative complications were higher in the elderly group than the younger group. The recovery rates of JOA score were 40.82 ± 11.20% in the elderly group and 64.10 ± 22.61% in the younger group. The therapeutic effects of surgery were significantly better for the young patients than for the elderly.
CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with CSM present long period and serious symptoms, and the degeneration of multiple organs. Surgical decompression for CSM appears to be a beneficial and safe procedure for older patients if properly handled, although the recovery rate is poorer than that of younger patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app