We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Immunoglobulin deficiency in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2015 December
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown a high prevalence of immunoglobulin deficiencies in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate this prevalence more precisely and to identify patients who need substitution treatment.
METHODS: All case series published after 1990 describing patients with CRS, which was defined as symptomatic rhinosinusitis for more than 12 weeks and documented immunoglobulin deficiencies (including deficiencies of IgG with subclasses, IgA, and IgM; specific antibody deficiencies; and potential common variable immunodeficiency), were retrieved. A meta-analysis of the proportion of any combination of common variable immunodeficiency, IgG deficiency, IgA deficiency, and IgM deficiency in patients with CRS was performed by using logit transformation of the prevalence. Recurrent CRS was defined as rhinosinusitis not controlled by appropriate conservative management for 4 months, and difficult-to-treat CRS was defined as noncontrollable rhinosinusitis despite successful sinus surgery and appropriate conservative management for at least 1 year.
RESULTS: The meta-analysis revealed a prevalence of pooled IgG, IgA, and IgM deficiencies in 13% of patients with recurrent CRS and 23% of patients with difficult-to-treat CRS. The prevalence of IgG subclass deficiency (5% to 50%) and specific antibody deficiency (8% to 34%) was increased in patients with CRS, as was the prevalence of respiratory allergies in patients with recurrent CRS (31% to 72%).
CONCLUSION: Immunoglobulin deficiency is a frequent condition in patients with CRS. An even higher prevalence of atopy was observed in patients with recurrent CRS. Therefore immunoglobulin titers and accurate allergy diagnostic workups are strongly recommended in these patients to provide specific treatments for symptom alleviation. However, there is a need for larger prospective studies addressing the effect of specific therapeutic interventions for CRS.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate this prevalence more precisely and to identify patients who need substitution treatment.
METHODS: All case series published after 1990 describing patients with CRS, which was defined as symptomatic rhinosinusitis for more than 12 weeks and documented immunoglobulin deficiencies (including deficiencies of IgG with subclasses, IgA, and IgM; specific antibody deficiencies; and potential common variable immunodeficiency), were retrieved. A meta-analysis of the proportion of any combination of common variable immunodeficiency, IgG deficiency, IgA deficiency, and IgM deficiency in patients with CRS was performed by using logit transformation of the prevalence. Recurrent CRS was defined as rhinosinusitis not controlled by appropriate conservative management for 4 months, and difficult-to-treat CRS was defined as noncontrollable rhinosinusitis despite successful sinus surgery and appropriate conservative management for at least 1 year.
RESULTS: The meta-analysis revealed a prevalence of pooled IgG, IgA, and IgM deficiencies in 13% of patients with recurrent CRS and 23% of patients with difficult-to-treat CRS. The prevalence of IgG subclass deficiency (5% to 50%) and specific antibody deficiency (8% to 34%) was increased in patients with CRS, as was the prevalence of respiratory allergies in patients with recurrent CRS (31% to 72%).
CONCLUSION: Immunoglobulin deficiency is a frequent condition in patients with CRS. An even higher prevalence of atopy was observed in patients with recurrent CRS. Therefore immunoglobulin titers and accurate allergy diagnostic workups are strongly recommended in these patients to provide specific treatments for symptom alleviation. However, there is a need for larger prospective studies addressing the effect of specific therapeutic interventions for CRS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app