JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Outcome of Surgery for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Role of Preoperative Static and Pulsatile Intracranial Pressure.

World Neurosurgery 2016 Februrary
OBJECTIVES: To examine the outcome of surgery for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and how outcome relates to the preoperative static and pulsatile intracranial pressure (ICP).

METHODS: An observational cohort study included all patients with iNPH managed at our department during the years 2002-2012 in whom overnight ICP monitoring was part of the preoperative work-up. Clinical data were retrieved from a quality registry and ICP scores from a pressure database.

RESULTS: The study included 472 patients, 316 in the surgery group and 156 in the nonsurgery group. Among those treated surgically, 278 (90%) showed clinical improvement (Responders) whereas 32 (10%) had no improvement (Nonresponders). Among Responders, only about one third reached the best clinical scores; moreover, the difference in clinical score between Responders and Nonresponders declined with time after surgery, particularly after 3-4 years. The surgery was accompanied by acute intracranial hematomas in 11 patients (3.5%), of whom 4 (1.3%) died. Survival (age at death) was significantly greater among the Responders than in Nonresponders. Although the static ICP was normal in all patients, the pulsatile ICP was significantly greater in Responders than in Non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS: The pulsatile ICP was greater in shunt Responders than Nonresponders. Although the clinical improvement declined over time and the majority did not experience complete relief of symptoms, shunt Responders lived significantly longer than Nonresponders. The present observations suggest that the current surgical treatment regimens for iNPH (primarily shunt surgery) address only some aspects of the disease process, in particular the aspect of brain water disturbance.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app