We have located links that may give you full text access.
Case Reports
Journal Article
Perforators as recipients for free flap reconstruction of the inguinal and perineal region.
Microsurgery 2015 November
OBJECTIVE: Extensive defects of the perineal or inguinal area require well vascularized free flap coverage. This area has an abundance of perforating arteries and veins based on vessels from the femoral artery and internal iliac artery. We present our experience on the use of perforators as recipient vessels in reconstructing soft tissue defects of the perineal and inguinal area with free flaps.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2012 to August 2014, 13 patients underwent free flap reconstruction for soft tissue defects of the inguinal or perineal area. Perforating arteries with diameters ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 mm were used as recipient arteries. Accompanying veins or neighboring superficial veins were secured as recipient veins.
RESULTS: All flaps survived attached to a recipient perforator with a diameter ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 mm. These vessels were found in the inguinal or perineal areas, regions that are supplied by the superficial circumflex iliac vessels, superficial inferior epigastric vessels, superficial and deep external pudendal vessels, lateral and medial circumflex femoral vessels, and internal pudendal vessels. There were no cases of arterial insufficiency or venous congestion, flap necrosis, or infection. A single case of hematoma beneath the flap was treated by simple evacuation. There were no donor complications.
CONCLUSION: Using perforators as the recipient during free flap reconstruction of the inguinal and perinea area allows the surgeon to choose from a wider choice of vessels, and yields acceptable flap survival.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2012 to August 2014, 13 patients underwent free flap reconstruction for soft tissue defects of the inguinal or perineal area. Perforating arteries with diameters ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 mm were used as recipient arteries. Accompanying veins or neighboring superficial veins were secured as recipient veins.
RESULTS: All flaps survived attached to a recipient perforator with a diameter ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 mm. These vessels were found in the inguinal or perineal areas, regions that are supplied by the superficial circumflex iliac vessels, superficial inferior epigastric vessels, superficial and deep external pudendal vessels, lateral and medial circumflex femoral vessels, and internal pudendal vessels. There were no cases of arterial insufficiency or venous congestion, flap necrosis, or infection. A single case of hematoma beneath the flap was treated by simple evacuation. There were no donor complications.
CONCLUSION: Using perforators as the recipient during free flap reconstruction of the inguinal and perinea area allows the surgeon to choose from a wider choice of vessels, and yields acceptable flap survival.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app