Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Perventricular device closure of ventricular septal defects: results in patients less than 1 year of age.

OBJECTIVES: To present and share our experience in perventricular device closure of ventricular septal defects in patients less than 1 year old.

METHODS: From 2012-2014, 51 patients less than 1 year old with ventricular septal defects were operated on with minimally invasive transthoracic device closure under the guidance of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP). The median age at operation was 8.0 ± 2.5 months and the mean body weight was 7.9 ± 3.4 kg; 7.3% (5) of patients had a weight less than 5 kg. The Qp/Qs ratio was 1.9 ± 0.4. The ventricular septal defect size ranged from 3 to 9 mm; the mean diameter was 5.7 ± 1.6 mm; 27.4% (14) of defects were subaortic, 66.7% (34) perimembranous and 5.9% (3) were muscular. For defect closure, we used a ventricular septal defect occlusion device (Lepu Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) through a 3-cm skin incision in the lower third of the sternum.

RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 96.1% and there were 2 patients who were converted to open-heart surgery (3.9%) during procedures. The operation time 'skin to skin' was 55.9 ± 41.0 (40) min; 48.8% of cases were less than 40 min. Intensive care unit stay was 16.5 ± 9.4 (18) h; ventilation time was 3.2 ± 3.5 (2) h; all patients did not require inotropic support, blood transfusion and analgesia. Of the total, 7.8% (4) of patients had residual shunt of not more than 1 mm; there were no atrioventricular blocks, rhythm disturbances or other types of major complications in the early postoperative period. Length of hospital stay was 5.6 ± 3.2 days. The mean follow-up was 18.7 ± 10.1. Residual shunts, conduction disturbances or valve complications were not observed in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Perventricular device closure of ventricular septal defects showed safety and high efficiency in patients less than 1 year of age, compared with conventional surgical repair with cardiopulmonary bypass, and provided a short period of rehabilitation and excellent cosmetic result.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app