We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Use of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Between Maligant and Benign Meningiomas. A Multicenter Analysis.
World Neurosurgery 2016 April
BACKGROUND: Meningioma is the most frequent intracranial tumor and is often an incidental finding on imaging. Some imaging-based scores were suggested for differentiating low- and high-grade meningiomas. The purpose of this work was to compare diffusion-weighted imaging findings of different meningiomas in a large multicenter study by using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for predicting tumor grade and proliferation potential.
METHODS: Data from 7 radiologic departments were acquired retrospectively. Overall, 389 patients were collected. All meningiomas were investigated by magnetic resonance imaging (1.5-T scanner) by using diffusion-weighted imaging (b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2)). The comparison of ADC values was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: World Health Organization grade I was diagnosed in 271 cases (69.7%), grade II in 103 (26.5%), and grade III in 15 patients (3.9%). Grade I meningiomas showed statistically significant higher ADC values (1.05 ± 0.39 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1)) in comparison with grade II (0.77 ± 0.15 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1); P = 0.001) and grade III tumors (0.79 ± 0.21 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1); P = 0.01). An ADC value of <0.85 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1) was determined as the threshold in differentiating between grade I and grade II/III meningiomas (sensitivity, 72.9%; specificity, 73.1%; accuracy, 73.0%). Ki67 was associated with ADC (r = -0.63, P < 0.001). The optimal threshold for the ADC was (less than) 0.85 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1) for detecting tumors with high proliferation potential (Ki67 ≥5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The estimated threshold ADC value of 0.85 can differentiate grade I meningioma from grade II and III tumors. The same ADC value is helpful for detecting tumors with high proliferation potential.
METHODS: Data from 7 radiologic departments were acquired retrospectively. Overall, 389 patients were collected. All meningiomas were investigated by magnetic resonance imaging (1.5-T scanner) by using diffusion-weighted imaging (b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2)). The comparison of ADC values was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: World Health Organization grade I was diagnosed in 271 cases (69.7%), grade II in 103 (26.5%), and grade III in 15 patients (3.9%). Grade I meningiomas showed statistically significant higher ADC values (1.05 ± 0.39 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1)) in comparison with grade II (0.77 ± 0.15 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1); P = 0.001) and grade III tumors (0.79 ± 0.21 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1); P = 0.01). An ADC value of <0.85 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1) was determined as the threshold in differentiating between grade I and grade II/III meningiomas (sensitivity, 72.9%; specificity, 73.1%; accuracy, 73.0%). Ki67 was associated with ADC (r = -0.63, P < 0.001). The optimal threshold for the ADC was (less than) 0.85 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1) for detecting tumors with high proliferation potential (Ki67 ≥5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The estimated threshold ADC value of 0.85 can differentiate grade I meningioma from grade II and III tumors. The same ADC value is helpful for detecting tumors with high proliferation potential.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app