We have located links that may give you full text access.
Systemic immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil to prevent corneal graft rejection after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty: a 2-year follow-up study.
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2016 Februrary
PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to prevent corneal graft rejection after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.
METHODS: One hundred and ninety-six consecutive patients who underwent high-risk penetrating keratoplasty defined as the presence of deep vascularization in more than two quadrants, keratouveitis, emergency keratoplasties, and retransplantations were enrolled in the study. Ninety-eight prospectively followed up patients were treated with MMF [with dose adjustment based on mycophenolic acid (MPA) serum concentration], and 98 patients were in the non-MMF-treated retrospectively assessed control group.
RESULTS: During a mean of 24 months of observation, immune reactions occurred in eight cases (8 %) and graft rejection with subsequent graft failure occurred in three cases (3 %) in the MMF group. In the control group, graft rejection occurred in 76 cases (78 %) and failure due to graft rejection occurred in 30 cases (31 %). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that 93 % of the grafts in the MMF-treated group and 47 % in the control group showed no immune rejection (p < 0.01, log-rank test) after a year. Cox regression analysis proved that MMF treatment decreased the risk of graft rejection 11 times (RR = 11, 95.0 % CI 4.8-25, p < 0.0001). Among 98 MMF-treated patients, 13 had gastric discomfort, three developed leucopenia, and two had anemia that resolved after MMF dose reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: MMF treatment after high risk penetrating keratoplasty is safe and reduces the incidence of immune graft rejection and graft failure. Side effects were rare and reversible in all but one case.
METHODS: One hundred and ninety-six consecutive patients who underwent high-risk penetrating keratoplasty defined as the presence of deep vascularization in more than two quadrants, keratouveitis, emergency keratoplasties, and retransplantations were enrolled in the study. Ninety-eight prospectively followed up patients were treated with MMF [with dose adjustment based on mycophenolic acid (MPA) serum concentration], and 98 patients were in the non-MMF-treated retrospectively assessed control group.
RESULTS: During a mean of 24 months of observation, immune reactions occurred in eight cases (8 %) and graft rejection with subsequent graft failure occurred in three cases (3 %) in the MMF group. In the control group, graft rejection occurred in 76 cases (78 %) and failure due to graft rejection occurred in 30 cases (31 %). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that 93 % of the grafts in the MMF-treated group and 47 % in the control group showed no immune rejection (p < 0.01, log-rank test) after a year. Cox regression analysis proved that MMF treatment decreased the risk of graft rejection 11 times (RR = 11, 95.0 % CI 4.8-25, p < 0.0001). Among 98 MMF-treated patients, 13 had gastric discomfort, three developed leucopenia, and two had anemia that resolved after MMF dose reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: MMF treatment after high risk penetrating keratoplasty is safe and reduces the incidence of immune graft rejection and graft failure. Side effects were rare and reversible in all but one case.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app