JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Intraoperative anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents: the incidence over 9 years at two tertiary hospitals in South Korea: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) is a rare event that is unpredictable and potentially life threatening. Most of the previous reports on such intraoperative anaphylaxis used market share surveys or self-reported data to estimate the incidence.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidences of intraoperative anaphylaxis to NMBAs using electronic medical records.

DESIGN: A retrospective observational study.

SETTING: Two tertiary hospitals in South Korea.

PATIENTS: This study involved patients exposed to NMBAs during anaesthesia between 1 January 2005 and 31 May 2014. Nineteen episodes were deemed to be intraoperative anaphylaxis to NMBAs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated the incidences of intraoperative anaphylaxis to NMBAs. Exposure to the agents was determined from intraoperative records maintained in an electronic medical recording system. An anaphylactic reaction was determined from both clinical signs and the results of skin tests.

RESULTS: Over 9 years, 729 429 patients were exposed to NMBA, the most frequently used being rocuronium [425 047 (58.3%)] and vecuronium [274 801 (37.7%)]. The overall incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis was 2.6 per 100 000 (19 cases), and was higher with rocuronium (16 cases, 3.8 per 100 000) than with vecuronium (two cases, 0.7 cases per 100 000), P = 0.014. Comparing the first 3 years with the last 6 years, the incidence of intraoperative rocuronium anaphylaxis appeared to increase 1.4-fold (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION: Among commonly used NMBAs, rocuronium appears to have the highest incidence of anaphylaxis. Our findings suggest that future prospective investigation for NMBA-induced anaphylaxis should use internationally agreed skin test protocols.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app