We have located links that may give you full text access.
EVALUATION STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Central Pedicle Reduction in Gigantomastia Without Free Nipple Graft.
Annals of Plastic Surgery 2016 April
BACKGROUND: Various pedicle techniques have been described in breast reduction surgery. However, in cases of massive hypertrophy, the free nipple graft technique is still being performed by some surgeons out of fear of losing the nipple-areolar complex (NAC). As such, we evaluated patients with severe gigantomastia who underwent the central pedicle horizontal scar reduction mammaplasty technique.
METHODS: The records of 257 patients who underwent the central pedicle reduction technique were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic properties of the patients and the distances from the midclavicular point to the nipple were recorded. Patients whose distance from the midclavicular point to both nipple areolar complexes (NACs) was 38 cm or greater were included in this study. Resection weights and postoperative complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: The distance from the midclavicular point to both NACs was 38 cm or greater in 53 patients (106 breasts). The age range of the patients was 17 to 73 years, and the mean body mass index was 39.6 kg/m. The range of distances from the midclavicular point to the nipple was 38 to 52 cm. The weight of the breast tissue excised ranged between 1450 and 2785 g. None of the patients experienced total nipple loss postoperatively, and all of the patients were satisfied with the aesthetic results.
CONCLUSION: We were able to reduce all of the breasts safely, without using the free nipple grafting technique, even in very large breasts. This study shows that the central pedicle horizontal scar reduction technique is a very safe and effective method for use in massive reductions. Therefore, we strongly recommend using the central pedicle reduction mammaplasty technique in cases of gigantomastia.
METHODS: The records of 257 patients who underwent the central pedicle reduction technique were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic properties of the patients and the distances from the midclavicular point to the nipple were recorded. Patients whose distance from the midclavicular point to both nipple areolar complexes (NACs) was 38 cm or greater were included in this study. Resection weights and postoperative complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: The distance from the midclavicular point to both NACs was 38 cm or greater in 53 patients (106 breasts). The age range of the patients was 17 to 73 years, and the mean body mass index was 39.6 kg/m. The range of distances from the midclavicular point to the nipple was 38 to 52 cm. The weight of the breast tissue excised ranged between 1450 and 2785 g. None of the patients experienced total nipple loss postoperatively, and all of the patients were satisfied with the aesthetic results.
CONCLUSION: We were able to reduce all of the breasts safely, without using the free nipple grafting technique, even in very large breasts. This study shows that the central pedicle horizontal scar reduction technique is a very safe and effective method for use in massive reductions. Therefore, we strongly recommend using the central pedicle reduction mammaplasty technique in cases of gigantomastia.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app