JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
REVIEW
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Does prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct reduce chylothorax rates in patients undergoing oesophagectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A systematic review of English and non-English articles using OVID MEDLINE (1980-2014) was performed to evaluate the potential value of prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct in preventing chylous leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Search terms included [Oesophagectomy OR esophagectomy] AND [chylothorax] AND [thoracic duct ligation]. Only those papers that directly compared the incidence of chylothorax in patients who underwent prophylactic ligation [ligation group (LG)] with that in those who had conservative treatment were selected [preservation group (PG)]; all the articles presenting original data and supplying sufficient information on the chylothorax rate after oesophagectomy were included. Independent extraction of articles was performed by two authors using predefined data fields, including study quality indicators. The PRISMA guidelines were carefully adhered to. A total of 5254 subjects were included in the 7 clinical studies examined into the current meta-analysis. Of these, 2179 patients underwent prophylactic ligature of the thoracic duct (LG group) and 3075 had preservation of the thoracic duct (PG group). A significant difference in terms of chylothorax rate [odd ratios (ORs) 0.47 in favour of LG, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.80] was noted between the LG group and the PG group. According to our meta-analysis and taking into account-specific caveats, prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct could be considered as an effective preventative measure to reduce the incidence of postoperative chylothorax.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app