We have located links that may give you full text access.
AST: A Simplified 3-item Tool for Managing Alcohol Withdrawal.
AIMS: This study compared the Glasgow Modified Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (GMAWS) and a newly devised 3-item "Anxiety Sweats Tremor" Scale (AST) to the Revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Scale (CIWA-Ar)-the standard of care for symptom-triggered management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome.
METHODS: Our study took place over 2 separate 1-week observational periods, and included 332 serial evaluations from 85 unique patients. All study participants were treated per hospital protocol based on CIWA-Ar, with supplemental scoring initially by GMAWS and later by AST in tandem. Internal consistency, interitem correlation, and operational characteristics were explored.
RESULTS: Median CIWA-Ar score across both phases was 6 (range 0-13), with a median GMAWS score of 2 (range 0-5) and an AST score of 3 (range 0-7). The internal consistency of CIWA-Ar and GMAWS were both poor, with Cronbach alpha scores of 0.46 (n = 156) and 0.41 (n = 156), respectively. The internal consistency of the AST scale was significantly better, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.68 (n = 176). AST identified individuals with CIWA-Ar ≥8 with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.89), compared with 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.74-0.88) for GMAWS. An AST score of ≥3 (out of a possible 9) predicted CIWA-Ar ≥8, with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 63%, whereas the GMAWS had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 12%, respectively, based on previously defined cut-offs.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple 3-item scale demonstrated good internal consistency and reliably identified individuals experiencing significant alcohol withdrawal. This scale needs to be tested in other settings and among patients with a broader spectrum of withdrawal severity.
METHODS: Our study took place over 2 separate 1-week observational periods, and included 332 serial evaluations from 85 unique patients. All study participants were treated per hospital protocol based on CIWA-Ar, with supplemental scoring initially by GMAWS and later by AST in tandem. Internal consistency, interitem correlation, and operational characteristics were explored.
RESULTS: Median CIWA-Ar score across both phases was 6 (range 0-13), with a median GMAWS score of 2 (range 0-5) and an AST score of 3 (range 0-7). The internal consistency of CIWA-Ar and GMAWS were both poor, with Cronbach alpha scores of 0.46 (n = 156) and 0.41 (n = 156), respectively. The internal consistency of the AST scale was significantly better, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.68 (n = 176). AST identified individuals with CIWA-Ar ≥8 with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.89), compared with 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.74-0.88) for GMAWS. An AST score of ≥3 (out of a possible 9) predicted CIWA-Ar ≥8, with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 63%, whereas the GMAWS had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 12%, respectively, based on previously defined cut-offs.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple 3-item scale demonstrated good internal consistency and reliably identified individuals experiencing significant alcohol withdrawal. This scale needs to be tested in other settings and among patients with a broader spectrum of withdrawal severity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app